This post was originally written as a comment on Lucy’s blog, which I love. It’s was my reaction to this post: http://acommonbook.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/who-is-a-writer/
After accidentally hitting post before getting to truly finish my point (yes, I AM always that long-winded), I decided to repost my comment as my own blog.
Last night, I told Cavey (my affectionate name for my boyfriend) about the existence of my wordpress blog, and asked if he would like to read it. I stole him away from ESPN for a few, precious moments and watched intently as he read my introduction to the wordpress community. His first reaction was, “It’s good.” That overwhelming dose of positive reinforcement was immediately followed by, “Lots of writers don’t like you guys…you bloggers.” Well, lucky for him I was already partially sedated from my chamomile tea and my new Jodi Picoult novel, so I didn’t claw into him too ferociously. Poor Cavey, he didn’t realize he was being insulting. After all, he was just repeating a sentiment that he’d obviously overheard on none other than…a sports show.
“What do you MEAN writers don’t like bloggers?” I asked. “That’s insane. That’s like saying dancers don’t like ballerinas. Bloggers ARE writers.”
I really was completely naive to the fact that many professional* (paid) hard-copy writers feel that bloggers like you and I are stepping on their toes, invading their territory, and generally just wasting our own time. A little Yahooing on the topic and I realized Cavey was right! Many writers* (the non-blogging type) really DON’T like us!
I don’t get it? Why isn’t blogging accepted and respected? The reasons I found aren’t doing it for me. I’m not even willing to see the other side; which is odd for me since I’m usually very open-minded. The right to express oneself through writing isn’t found in some exclusive, gated community to which one has to prove him/herself to gain admission. As long as people are free to speak, I should be free to write. Here are some of the reasons the Paper Snobs want to shut down the Cyber Scribes.
1. “The CSs lack accountability for the topics they choose to discuss. They can “get away” with misinforming the public as well as disguising their own slant, influence, and personal agenda as the supposed facts.”
Hey, buddy, how about the idea of readers sharing some of the responsibility? I doubt very much that many people here on wordpress are petitioning for their blogs to replace textbooks in schools. We’re mainly catering to an adult community of writers who CHOOSE to read what we post. If I saw a blog posted and it said that there was a threat of toxic mercury poisoning from eating zucchini, you think I’d throw all my fresh garden greens into the garbage? No! Because I DON’T BELIEVE EVERYTHING I READ. And if I did? That would be my own fault. I’m not just skeptical about information found in blogs; I’m skeptical about information published in well-known newspapers as well. Are the PSs really claiming that they’re always well-versed in the topics they cover? I’m somewhat of an animal (especially American Pit bull Terrier) activist, and I rarely find that the journalists working for press do their homework before reporting. I recently read an article claiming that a “pit bull” attacked someone and it weighed well-over 100 pounds. That seems odd to me, because a real APBT would NEVER weigh over 65 pounds, and even THAT is heavy. I’d bet that the reporter in question couldn’t pick a pit bull out of a lineup of true APBTs, Dogo Argentinos, Cane Corsos, Boxers, Staffordshire Bull Terriers, Ca De Bous, Patterdale Terriers, and American or Alapaha Bulldogs. (Can you? Try it at http://www.pitbullsontheweb.com/petbull/findpit.html) I’ll BET the journalist in question just took the word of the eyewitness who called the dog a pit bull without doing any research of her own. Now how’s that for accountability?
2. “The CSs have no credentials and their writing is sub-standard, making the writing profession as a whole look like a joke.”
That’s just silly. Many bloggers DO have a strong list of credentials, and even most who don’t can hold their own with a keyboard OR a pen.
Furthermore, we’re not out there holding protests in front of print-book stores trying to steer potential purchasers away from the newest paperback. We’re here, online, whenever a reader CHOOSES to find us. I didn’t know that Penguin or any of the other pub. companies hold a monopoly over written freedom of speech!
And honestly, if we’re all such crappy writers, why are the PSs so bothered by our existence? If the PSs believe that their superb brand of writing caters to an intelligent and discriminating audience, why oh why would they think said audience would stray and begin reading (gasp) BLOGS? Hmmm…something for the PSs to chew on after they remove their feet from their mouths.
3. “We PSs have had to work hard to get where we are. It isn’t fair that these CSs are calling themselves writers even though they didn’t have to go through what we did to get here.”
I had to go through quite a lot to get to wherever ‘here’ is. I had to get certified as a teacher, complete a separate four year degree, overcome many personal obstacles, and spend countless hours writing dozens of blogs that not many people ever saw before getting my first loyal reader. I wrote and edited and reedited those little known blogs while holding a full time job and balancing the social, familial, and romantic aspects of my own life. As is the case with many bloggers, we are teachers, x-ray technicians, accountants, nurses, editors, lawyers, assistants, counselors, publicists, realtors, small-business owners, etc. etc. etc. And fact is fact; most of us are NOT receiving the same notoriety that print authors receive, so we’re hardly stealing anyone’s thunder. I deal with similar snobbery when I tell people I teach hip-hop dance to a group of middle school girls. I have no credentials to do so, but as most bloggers, I do so for FREE. I do so because there is a DEMAND for me to be there. I do so because no dance group would exist in town if I hadn’t started one. Do I have any credentials? No. Am I trying to choreograph for Dancing with the Stars? No! And you know what…if someone felt that I was good enough to do so…it shouldn’t matter if I’m credentialed-up enough or not! Ability is ability, and while I have a great deal of respect for the publishing process and how difficult it is to get a book in print, some of us simply do not have the hours available during the day right now to go through it!
I hope that this comment will serve as something more than a rant to at least one person who reads it. Fellow CSs, if you feel that any of my points are valid, please feel free to use them in OUR defense. I’m not turning my back on books. In fact, I’m devouring Change of Heart four chapters at a time every night before bed. Still, I truly enjoy plopping in front of my PC when I return home from work and reading the refreshing stories, opinions, and musings of all of YOU…my fellow WRITERS…here on wordpress.com.
I’m so happy I’ve found a new favorite writer to add to my list: Andrew Sean Greer (pleeeeeeeeeeease, people, read Confessions of Max Tivoli, you will thank me), Jodi Picoult, Alice Sebold, Emily Giffin, Jessica Brody (The Fidelity Files…girls, you just GOTTA!), and Lucy (http://acommonbook.wordpress.com). A recent prop to me in one of her latest postings called a comment I left for her “inspirational”. That means one of my favorite writers called a comment I sent to her INSPIRATIONAL! If that’s not reason enough to love the immediate connections we make through the wonderful FORM OF WRITING that is blogging, then I don’t know what is!
Cyber Scribes unite! Tell those Paper Snobs (and by that I mean offense only to the actual SNOBS of the print-publication world) that it’s deductive reasoning! It’s eighth-grade math!
You go and tell those Paper Snobs that it’s a simple matter of logic through categorical syllogisms. Bloggers are writers. I am a blogger. Therefore, I am a writer.
Makes sense to me.